Interreligious Dialogue Essay

duologue with look on to theological pluralism Statistics show that most of the cosmeas humanity is affiliated with some type of holiness, with deliverymanianity and Islam encompassing reasonably over 50% of the population. though interreligious colloquy is beneficial in gaining a better arrest of an others piety, is it possible to throttle whizs righteousness as be the compulsive justness while engaging in an open interreligious dialogue with a nonher religion?Many spiritual throng forget tend to be theological exclusivists, because a lot of the religions argon divided and differ in many ways from angiotensin-converting enzyme a nonher, tho they must accept the values and beliefs of other flock if they argon to retain truly faithful to the conviction of their traditions. Interreligious dialogue in a broad(a) sense is being in communication with individual of a contrary religion to increase the apprehensiveness of ones own religion or tradition as well as o thers. Since half of the worlds population is either Christian or Muslim, we result get word a manifestation into the differences these religions sh atomic number 18s.One of the main issues is developed in Klostermaiers book, In the Paradise of Krishna. It exemplifies some of the differences religions tend to hold, such as the discussion in the midst of Muslims and Christians on where the role of Jesus stands in Senestant 2 conjunction to idol. Muslims check out that Jesus was an eventful figure and served a purpose as a great t distributivelyer of righteousness, but fail to see his true connection with deity the bring forth. They claim that he is solitary(prenominal) a prophet send by paragon but not equal to God.The plant Klostermaier takes on Jesus, or Son of Man, is that he is the move manpowert towards God in every being. He is what ultimately allows for us to decl atomic number 18 a affinity with God. The Son of Man however bushels use of two basic distinctions My Father on the one side everything else on the other. He doesnt adjudicate raft based off of other deals shrewdness or the rules set by man, rather he judges heap based on their relation to the Father. Klostermaier excessively wants us to recognize that Christ is not an avatara.There were many tidy sum before Jesus snip who were sent on this earth to save Gods deal from particular calamities that were caused by creation. Those people were very important because they were chosen by God to do his depart. Noahs obedience to Gods miss to salvage humanity by building an arc to withstand the scarf out or Moses standing up to the Pharaoh and allowing his people to be set destitute be just a few instances of Gods sons who assist in salvation. Saying Jesus is the Only Son of God is place a limitation on the abilities of God and not recognizing his full power.It besides confuses the Muslim sect because of their belief that God sent many people through with(predicate)out history who were a source of deliverance from any happening that was occurring at the time. They ar referred to as prophets at that placefore Jesus must also be a prophet and nothing more. Instead, he wants us to look at Christ as the movement to God Senestant 3 that will grant us ultimate salvation. He is the deciding factor that will determine whether we will enjoy eternity in the promise play or feel the wrath of God as we torment in hell.A second main issue in the book is dialoguing on a daily basis with familiar and unfamiliar religions. Before dialoguing with other people, its crucial to view a great understanding on your own religion. Its very important to study and learn what your beliefs are founded upon, although its very time consuming and doesnt aid in spiritual progress. While it is good to study and familiarize yourself with the religion you are currently practicing, it is also beneficial to converse with others about your religion as well.People tend to all see whats on the summon because they are uneducated and misguided on certain areas and fail in attempting to delve deeper to find the true meaning of things. As you enter into dialogue with someone of an oppose religion, you must be very open-minded and apathetic to allow each other to learn things that arent obvious at first glance. It allows for a different perspective of who you think you are and helps you disclose if youre animation and acting according to your beliefs. Its also important to have inner dialogue with yourself.Meditating and reflecting on the impact our religion have in our lives and in our hearts. Is the essence of Hinduism and Christianity or any other religion we profess just words coming out of our mouths or does it promptly impact our lives and allows us to live in peace and unity? These are the questions we must ask ourselves in helping to determine if were living in fallacy and wasting our time, or if were in amity to Senestant 4 our beliefs. A starving old Brahmin talked about quartet kinds of people praying some pray that God should preserve their wealth, others that God should blow over them wealth.Those who asked for heavens were better but those who neither had nor wanted riches and did not ask for heaven, but only wished to serve God for his own sake, they were the best. (Klostermaier 95) Those people who only wished to serve God know of his magnificence and splendor and being connected to that will enhance their spirituality and respect for man and not traditions. This allows anyone from any religion to extend like brothers and sisters. If we insisted on our theologies you as a Christian, I as a Hindu we should be fighting each other.We have found one another because we probed more deeply, towards spirituality. (Klostermaier 99) A leash issue in the book is the idea of three souls in one God. Many established religions celestial horizon God as being absolute and indescribable because of how minute we are compared to God. Other religions are able to image the physical nature of God and give him attributes and qualities which stooge only be possible if this God was visible. However, Christians hold the strength that God is both of these things and can go between each form when necessary. This is seen by God revealing himself through his son Jesus Christ.Through him were able to be survey attached and have understanding of where our beliefs lie. When other religions look at Christianity, they view it as a religion without any real philosophy and that it has taken its teachings from everywhere and justifies them by claiming to give the only true revelation, to Senestant 5 make out the only salvation (Klostermaier 29). Therefore they see it as being untested when relating to religion. They even go as far as saying theyre uneducated on their religion in that locationfore they cant hold intelligent conversations and go in depth on the various issues that consume religion.I found this to be very true because as a Christian myself, I attempted to discuss religion with one of my infidel friends. After a few minutes went by, I realized I didnt know as much as I thought. It guide me to examining what I believed in and why. Towards the end of the conversation, I grew more respect for people who werent adapted to a particular religion and unsounded theres a lot that can be learned from them. It showed me the lowliness of the different sects of religion and only claiming to a religion without close mental testing of it will lead to immaturity and idiocy.As a Sikh prof in Klostermaiers book says, Religion cannot be proved by logic religion is inner experience. (Klostermaier 31) This inner experience is affirmed through meditation as well as the various acts of people around you whom you have no association with. When looking at theological exclusivism versus pluralism, it is misidentify as to whether they are relevant in deciding whether to converse with people of diffe rent religions. Looking only at theological exclusivism, it is the theological position that holds to the finality of the Christian faith in Christ.The finality of Christ representation that there is no salvation outside the Christian faith. By definition, exclusivism seems to be self-contradictory. It contains the fact that Senestant 6 human beings are limited in the touchstone of knowledge they have and are unable to understand the infinite(God) to its fullness. However, followers of this ideal are not restricted in believing that they are the only people that have the ability to be connected to God. They look at people of other religions as being infidels, not actually having a religious belief.They also claim to be the ones most devoted to God, when in all actuality they are just followers of religious doctrine, created by man. Though the Bible was created by man, it was said to be created through spiritual counsel of the Most High. Every religious person who looks at the Bi ble sees it as being full of truth, which by nature is exclusivist. So everyone who follows the rules and guidelines the Bible have set in place is partially exclusivist. Since the Bible is considered as be exclusivist, it is only right to dwell on some of teachings it talks about.It talks about a God, who is full of mercy and compassion, one who whops all of his children and continues to love them through all the sins they have committed and continue to commit. It is a God that loved us so much that, he gave his one and only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have fadeless life. (Stoughton 897) A God of this nature does not sound like a God that will only come to save those who believe in Christ. Although that was his only begotten son, they are many people who do not have the opportunity to believe in such a religion. This can be caused by the way the person was rought up, or where the person was brought up, in which case Christianity was not the r eligion of choice. They are also instances of when someone dies prematurely and does not Senestant 7 have the opportunity to have a true relationship with Christ Jesus. These people shouldnt be and are not exempt from the sanctifying grace of God. This is a God who created all of mankind in his image and likeness, so that everyone will have the ability to be saved. God must be seen at the center of religions / The pluralistic sway is that all religions are fundamentally the same though superficially different. (Hick 42) The pluralist believes that the world religions are true and equally valid in their communication of the truth about God, the world, and salvation. This is also backed by the Larousse Dictionary of Beliefs and Religions, which says that other religions possess validity and truth in their own right / These religions are understood as different cultural reflections or expressions of the same divine pragmatism and as such constitute legitimate ways to God (Larousse 43 7). This seems to make the most logical sense because we are not sole-bearers of the truth.We were only created to applause and give worship to the Almighty. Since this is true, we will all have our own understanding and interpretations about who God is, what our place is in this world and why we were created, and the travel in receiving salvation. At the core of our beliefs we hold the same truths, but slightly differ in minor details. Some examples are the day in which we should attend mass or how often we should pray. Yes these things are important and are what gives meaning to our life, but God only requires us to recognize who he is and the impact he has in our lives. By whatsoever way men worship Me, even so do I accept them for, in all ways, O Partha, men walk in My path. Senestant 8 (Bhagavad-Gita 4. 11) God is evident in all religions that have him in its center. As longsighted as his followers stay true to the doctrine their religion provides, God will have favor on th em. Many of the religions out there share these commonalities so they should be treated with equality when evaluating their doctrine with respect to God. In the sense of interreligious dialogue, the idea of being a theological exclusivist is irrelevant.It does not bring anything meaningful to the table when people of two different religions come together. Rather it would just be hurtful banter between the opposing religions and nothing worthwhile will be accomplished. Since by definition, an exclusivist can only view their religion and belief as being the only one which holds the absolute truth, to deviate from this by indulging in conversations that can voltage alter that belief is dangerous and when placed in a position like that, mockery will be imminent. The only way the beef up interreligious dialogue is through a pluralist outlook.They both go hand in hand, in that a pluralist will be very open to dialogue. This will increase their knowledge of not only the other persons rel igion but also ones own, since they both ascendent from the same root. Senestant 9 Works Cited 1)Goring, Rosemary, Frank Whaling, John Marshall, and David Brogan. Larousse Dictionary of Beliefs and Religions. Edinburgh Larousse, 1994. Print. 2)Lopresti, Matthew. INTER-RELIGIOUS dialog AND RELIGIOUS PLURALISM A Philosophical Critique of Pope Benedict xvi and the Fall of Religious Absolutism (Matthew LoPresti) Academia. edu. Hawaii peaceable University Academia. du. Hawaii Pacific University. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. . 3)Marbaniang, Domenic. Theology Of Religions Pluralism, Inclusivism, Exclusivism Earthpages. org. Earthpages. org. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. . 4)Bhagavadgita. Lewiston, N. Y. u. a. Edwin Mellen Pr. , 2010. Print. 5)Klostermaier, Klaus, and Antonia Fonseca. In the Paradise of Krishna Hindu and Christian Seekers. Philadelphia Westminster, 1969. Print. 6)Hick, John. God and the Universe of Faiths Essays in the Philosophy of Religion. Basingstoke Macmillan, 1988. Print. 7)NIV Bible. London Hodder & Stoughton, 1997. Print.