Intelligence, “Nature Versus Nurture” Essay

Intelligence is the superpower to learn facts and skills and apply them it g sequence also be refer loss to as acquaintance. When we look at knowledge we typic ally look at it from the aspect of nature and nurture, nature being what we pass into this world with and nurture is what we acquire after we take for entered this world. But the forefront I am foc utilize on is where do we get our wisdom, ar we born with it or are we somewhat gaining it after birth, is a recent born shaver capable of knowing what is happening around him and assume up knowing how to act as an adult from birth or do he have to acquire the ability for adult murder?.So the look into I am referring to was taught by one Dr. Richard Gerring, where taking a new born baby bird and imagine what it would be alike(p) to come into a situation as such a child. genius such example of testing perception starts with perceptions. It was thought for a long time that children was color blind, beca employment we could not just ask a neonate do you see colourise?, so the first experiment to notice whether a child beh sure-enough(a) color would be from one tec by the name of Burstein. Burstein took a station of 3 month old kids and fix them solid colored monkeys and currently the kids got tired of looking at the toys over and over once more than now the unproblematic fact close colors is the shake length that they give off, colors such as green or orange gives off a bright wave length that is attractive, but a color like grey and uninfected has dull wave lengths. Or also if you keep looking at the homogeneous color whether bright green or red you would soon get tired of the color because your brain has already adapted to it and you beseem bored.So to test this theory I did my own experiment.Scientific doubtfulnessCan children perceive colors and visit commute although they are pure and have not yet fully acquired learn intelligence of deviation?HypothesisChildren do pe rceive colors, they also have an intelligence of change in the factors around them just as older children and adults do thus far though they are of young age.My objectiveTo see whether children do perceive and understand colors although they may not know the colors by names, do they have the ability to detect the change from such a young age.Type of design of Qualitative InvestigationInvestigation- exploitSo with this experiment I am taking Three (5) children ages 3 months to 2 eld old and place all of them in the same room for 5 age for 3 hours with the same set of toys 2 red hand truck and 4 yellow cars. Based on investigation 5 mean solar daylights/3 hours results, an action would be taken to confirm findings.MethologyThe study subject that we will carry out is descriptive.Universe A preschool at the club center, Vanard, Castries.Manipulate 5 children ages 3 months to 2 years old.Operational variables fire and ages of the children, place and timeIndependent Variables Colo rs of toysTechniques used to obtain the data of this study* Direct ObservationThere conveys to be unending observation of the children while playing with the toys and note the level of reside that is minded(p) to each toy over the period of 5 days for 3 hours, and because analyze data at the end of each daywhether the interest dwindles or not.Make a note of just how lotstimes had the attention dwindled.Analysis of Data solar day 1 on the whole 5 kids are happy with the new toys for the 3 hours mean solar day 2 All kids are happy and move around contentedly with the toys Day 3 The Kids are demonstrating a lack of interest in the toys now and have come to interchange a lot between the 6 pieces. Day 4 The children are no long grabbing for the toys but are line of descent to get very frets and occasionally when I give them a toy they may calm a bit but then cover up to fret. Obvious signs that they no longer are interested in the toys. Day 5 Today is they last day and I have notice for the past 2 hours nobody took the toys, at the 3rd hour they were all crying. Gathered Results At the end of day five, I had a set of crying kids on my hands who were obviously unhappy and who were definitely were no longer interested in the given toys.So back I determine that the Children are just bored by the toys in themselves or the colors?So now what I would do is my action to the investigation to confirm the results from the 5 days. I took the same set of toys, 2 red truck and 4 yellow cars and I repainted them (please note that paint used was indeed child friendly and not harmful in toxins). The toys were repainted and reintroduced again the next day for the same 3 hours.Final Results Amazing The Kids grabbed at those toys as if they were new and were all laughs with the very same toys that yesterday accepted no attention. This proves simply that young children although they are not yet soundly cognitively develop do see colors. The fact that they saw the same color toys for 5 days for 3 hours and got bored on day 5 but had renewed interest in the same give toy on the 6 day when reintroduced in different colors told me they got a new stimulus to the change.That is a pretty interesting knowledge to confirm. For these children to knowthe difference in vision and its change and take interest in the toys do tells me they brought some intelligence into this into the world.So here we can see that we are born with the concept of knowing differences, which is great for gaining ability throughout life. Dr. Richard Gerring was saying that another way to tell children have intelligence is by using checkers on a board. You can use a young child under 5 years old and you spread the checker pieces between you and the child evenly, and ask the child who has more checkers, the child would say that you have more if you do or they do they would say. The point to this is that children understand the concept of  more or less although they do not know how to count. If you use two glasses of water then they can say which glass has more water and which do not. The fact that they understand quantity although they cannot express it shows intelligence that can be developed. So as the child gets older you start counting fingers and toes and soon the child can tell you that you have maybe 6 more than they do or 6 less. The fact that they grow to understand numbering tells us that they acquire knowledge and increase their intelligence from the mere concept of optic more or less that they originally had.So when we think of intelligence and we think of knowledge in the sense of nature vs nurture, we can safely say that some intelligence we are born with and are unified in our genes and there are some intelligence that are acquired and spread out upon but learning and concurring.Does this mean that our behavior can be manipulated from an earlyish age through education?This question is answered by a simple experiment. The experiment can be done by looking at how kids acquire action to word, if you try to speak to a child age 3 years as you would an adult the child would be confused. So you have to simplify your speech to that child to get him/her to do what you need him/her to do. Like when you are getting a child to eat food, you would mark the child in the high chair and by actions show the child you are unsolveding in your mouthpiece while saying aaaahh, your mouth opening and the wordaaaah suggest that every time you do the action and bring the spoon up with food you want the child to open their mouth and eat. So you link action and words which manipulates the child actions and often you hear people saying the words like yum yum with a grin expression while the childs eating to get them to understand that what they are eating is good. Therefore we get actions to words and perception of the food.So when it comes to knowledge our environmental factors can con-coursing an influence us, bringing us into do de cisions and having preferences to things that we were not born with.ReferenceLife of the Mind Introduction to Psychology, Richard Gerring.