.

Sunday, January 6, 2019

Drug Testing Welfare Recipients Essay

According to a meditate on the government of Canadas website, in 2003, 1.7 one thousand million muckle were on government assist and that number has continued to grow. The current unemployment range in Canada is 7.2% and m some(prenominal) of those families rely on the government to put food on the table, a roof over their heads and attire on their bodies, meaning that bills is absolutely prerequisite. However, working citizens be often fretful of the citizens taking the capital that they earned and just about argon demanding that welf ar recipients be dose tried and true in give to be eligible. Although nowhere in Canada requires do doses scrutiny to receive welfargon, several states in the unify States do. However, this idea fails to consider that drug examen recipients punishes children, ignores that drug addiction is a dis devote that ask treatment, and that it has proven to non retain money. Therefore, drug interrogatory in order to be eligible for wel fargon is harden and nothing further a mark of discrimination and selfishness in association.Taking by money from a citizen that tested substantiative for drugs would inequitablely punish their children, who are impoverished and didnt choose to nurse the parents they were born(p)(p) to. 81.5% of assistance recipients in okay are children (Richey), which means that m any children could miss immensely be take a shit of their parents actions. If a psyche on eudaemonia were to test authoritative for drugs and their cash in hand were to be taken out-of-door, their children would lose their entire source of income, which would mean they would suffer infinitely to a greater extent than they already did. The kids born to drug addicts would have no tiffin money or clothes for direct while alcoholics children still received funds. This would be extremely hypocritical and it is cruel to single out children that already have the odds sonsie against them. Living in scanti ness could  take them to do poorly in school and possibly turn to drugs themselves, completely obliterating any chance they had for a better future. It is achievable to argue that if parents are using drugs, they are already wasting the money that could go towards their children. Although this argument is true, completely taking a authority alone of the money is not expiration to solve the problem.More over, sending to a greater extent children into the already crowded foster bid system would also only cause more problems, a fact that American Public Health familiarity, the National Association of Social Workers, and the National Association of boozing and medicate Abuse Counselor alto startleher agree with as they oppose all laws mandating drug exam in order to receive government funding (Richey). Finally, the money that families receive could help struggling parents contract into rehab and back on their feet, allowing the children to overcome poverty and live a bette r life. The crying disregard for how drug exam those on welfare would ruin childrens lives proves that the form _or_ system of government is callous and selfish. In society it is general for citizens to discriminate and stigmatize drug addicts. They are stereotyped as lazy but in reality, drug addiction is a disease that quests treatment. A soul habituated to drugs cannot simply quit when they desire to.Continued drug use changes the alchemy of the brain, alters its structure and its ability to function normally. Moreover, images taken of drug addicts brains show that the areas that are necessary for proper judgment, and behaviour control are greatly damaged. Once someone is addicted to drugs it is no longer a intended choice to use, but something their body needs to function. It is wrong to discriminate against addicts because it is first and fore about, a disease, just like any otherwise mental illness and there should not be any stigma given over to it. Therefore, ent ry into a medically superintend treatment centre is necessary so taking away that addicts only source of income will not help them in any way and will only take in an increase in the homeless population. It is mathematical that some sight on welfare may be waiting to get into a treatment program and need the money to support themselves while they do so.The blatant disregard that the policy of drug testing welfare recipients has for the physical and neurologic effects that drug addiction has on a soulfulness clearly indicates the rigor and discrimination that the policy demonstrates. The final and most important argument is that drug testing does not cede any money. In fact it wastes it. The entire idea for drug testing is that drug users assistance could be terminated, and therefore drop a line taxpayers from wasting their money however, this is not the case. The be of producing and administering the tests have proven to cost more money than the governments neverthele ssd from terminating those found to have been using drugs. Utah spent $30 000 drug testing race on welfare and only 12 people tested positive. Similarly, only 2% of people receiving government assistance in Florida failed the test, compared to field of study drug usage rate of 8% (Covert).This suggests that the majority of drug users are not those living in poverty, and hints at the dirty discrimination they face. Additionally, a recent saucy York Times article stated that testing in Florida cost the government an extra $45 780, which is grossly wasteful. Comparably, out of the 8 states that are enforcing legislation, none of them are miserliness money. In Arizona, only 1 person in 3 years tested positive (Kelly). Every single study fage has shown that the state governments are losing money but more and more states are proposing it and citizens of Canada are pushing for it as well. As of 2013, 29 states have proposed the legislation, which is completely nonsensical. If no mon ey is being saved, why are so many people fundament the policy? The only possible causality has to be selfishness and the reluctance of citizens for their taxes to be handout toward fellow citizens less fortunate than themselves.This exemplifies how drug testing the poor is simply a symptom of discrimination in society and not a means to save money. With all of the evidence considered, there is no rebutting the fact that drug testing in order to be eligible for welfare is callous and nothing but a symptom of discrimination and selfishness in society. The testing punishes children, which is unfair, ignores the fact that drug addiction is a disease and most significantly, doesnt save any money. So many people are supporting this legislation but being poor should not result in someone being labeled as less than and a delinquent. It is unfair that the only standing reason for implementing or sustaining laws requiring drug testing is that people dont want their money spillage to the less fortunate that ultimately, need it for survival. For any person that supports these legislations the main question that should be pondered is why? Why should the poor be drug tested when everyone receives government funds in one way or another? The fact is, they should not.BibliographyCovert, Bryce.Utah spent More Than $30,000 To Catch 12 medicine Users On Welfare. ThinkProgress RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Mar. 2014.Kelly, Brian P. An Inane, Money-eating Sham Drug Tests for Welfare a Huge Failure. Saloncom RSS. N.p., 29 Aug. 2013. Web. 23 Mar. 2014.Richey, Kate. Five Reasons Not to Drug-test. Oklahoma Policy Institute. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Mar. 2014

No comments:

Post a Comment