Brutus and Antony are both portrayed as above fairly orators in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, and they both use this development to achieve in that respect preplanned goals in there speeches. Brutuss goal was to worm the assassination of Caesar and to convince the people that Brutus and his fellow conspirators were actually heroes for what they did. On the other hand Antonys goal was to turn the people of bang-up of Italy against the conspirators and to more brightly illuminate the good things that Caesar did, and in doing so make the people want to seek revenge for there leaders death. Even barelyugh Brutus and Antony have separate and just opposite goals they both use certain tactics to cost the crowd in there favor. They did this by appealing to the crowd, implement irony, and by applying the principles of human behavior to the situation.         First Brutus appealed to the crowed by forge himself seem no bett er than the people, and rationalized the assassination by pic display that he and his fellow conspirators killed Caesar not for there make gain, provided for the greater good of the general public. We see this in the honorable mention not that I sock Caesar less, but I cope Rome more.
This utilitarian point of view went over quite well with the people, so well in hap that they tried to give Brutus the crown, but he refused it which later false out to perhaps not be the best choice. On the flip side of the arguments Antonym appealed to the people of Rome by telling them what they knew all along, that Caesar was a g reat ruler that he cared about all of them. ! But he did not moreover tell the people this, he went a step tho and showed the people the will that... If you want to get a dewy-eyed of the mark essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment